From the psychological standpoint, the origins of ACIM raise issues about their validity. Helen Schucman, the principal scribe of the text, said that what were determined to her by an internal voice she identified as Jesus. This process of getting the writing through inner dictation, referred to as channeling, is often met with skepticism. Experts fight that channeling could be understood as a emotional trend rather than true spiritual revelation. Schucman himself was a medical psychologist, and some claim that the style she noticed has been a manifestation of her subconscious brain rather than an external heavenly entity. Additionally, Schucman indicated ambivalence about the task and its origins, sometimes pondering their reliability herself. This ambivalence, along with the technique of the text's party, casts uncertainty on the legitimacy of ACIM as a divinely inspired scripture.

This content of ACIM also encourages scrutiny from a philosophical angle. The course teaches that the world we perceive with your feelings is an impression and that our acim true truth lies beyond that physical realm. That idealistic see, which echoes certain Western philosophies, difficulties the materialistic and scientific foundations of European thought. Critics fight that the declare that the physical world can be an dream isn't substantiated by scientific evidence and goes counter to the medical approach, which relies on observable and measurable phenomena. The notion of an illusory earth might be compelling as a metaphor for the distortions of belief caused by the vanity, but as a literal assertion, it lacks the empirical support necessary to be considered a valid representation of reality.

Moreover, the sensible application of ACIM's teachings may be problematic. The program advocates for a significant form of forgiveness, suggesting that most grievances are illusions and should be overlooked and only knowing the inherent unity of all beings. While the training of forgiveness can certainly be healing and major, ACIM's strategy may possibly cause persons to suppress reliable thoughts and ignore real injustices. By mounting all negative activities as illusions developed by the vanity, there's a danger of minimizing or invalidating the lived activities of enduring and trauma. That perception could be especially hazardous for persons coping with critical dilemmas such as abuse or oppression, as it may discourage them from seeking the mandatory support and interventions.

Yet another place of argument is the way ACIM has been marketed and commercialized. Because its book, ACIM has spawned an important market of workshops, seminars, and supplementary materials. Critics argue that commercialization undermines the spiritual strength of the teachings, turning what is supposed to be a sacred text in to a profit-driven enterprise. The expansion of ACIM-related services and products and companies has light emitting diode some to issue the motivations behind its campaign and the reliability of those who maintain to teach their principles. This industrial element can create a buffer to authentic spiritual exploration, as people may be more dedicated to buying another book or joining the next workshop as opposed to participating profoundly with the teachings themselves.