The information of ACIM also attracts scrutiny from a philosophical angle. The program teaches that the entire world we comprehend with this senses is definitely an impression and our true truth lies beyond that bodily realm. That idealistic see, which echoes particular Eastern philosophies, challenges the materialistic and empirical foundations of European thought. Authorities disagree that the claim that the bodily world is an dream is not substantiated by empirical evidence and operates counter to the medical technique, which utilizes visible and measurable phenomena. The idea of an illusory earth may be powerful as a metaphor for the distortions of notion caused by the pride, but as a literal assertion, it lacks the scientific help required to be described as a legitimate illustration of reality.

Moreover, the practical program of ACIM's teachings could be problematic. The course advocates for a revolutionary form of forgiveness, suggesting that all grievances are illusions and must be neglected and only recognizing the inherent unity of most beings. While the training of forgiveness may certainly be therapeutic and transformative, ACIM's approach might lead people to control genuine thoughts and dismiss real injustices. By surrounding all bad experiences as illusions created by the ego, there is a risk of minimizing or invalidating the existed activities of putting up with and trauma. That perspective could be particularly harmful for individuals coping with serious problems such as abuse or oppression, as it may suppress them from seeking the required help and interventions.

Yet another position of competition is just how ACIM has been promoted and commercialized. Since their publication, ACIM has spawned a substantial business of workshops, seminars, and supplementary materials. Experts disagree that this commercialization undermines the religious strength of the teachings, turning what is supposed to become a sacred text in to a profit-driven enterprise. The proliferation of ACIM-related services and products and companies has led  acim to issue the motivations behind its promotion and the credibility of those that declare to teach their principles. This industrial aspect can produce a barrier to authentic religious exploration, as individuals may possibly become more dedicated to purchasing the next book or participating another course rather than participating profoundly with the teachings themselves.

Furthermore, the course's increased exposure of personal change via a modify in perception is visible as excessively simplistic in handling complex social and endemic issues. ACIM areas a strong emphasis on particular responsibility and the energy of your brain to shape one's reality. While this is empowering, it can also lead to a form of religious skipping, wherever individuals use spiritual concepts to avoid confronting difficult aspects of their lives or societal injustices. By focusing mainly on adjusting one's belief, ACIM may neglect the importance of getting concrete measures to address cultural, financial, and environmental challenges. That inward concentration can cause a questionnaire of isolationism, wherever individuals become so absorbed within their particular religious trip which they neglect their responsibilities to the broader community.